Can we forget something we did not live to remember? Nathan Wachtel argues that we do not remember on our own, but we can only make sense of recollections within the broader context which we belong to. Our identity is negotiated with reference to a past which we choose to remember, with reference to the group we are part of.

This process of recollection, therefore, takes place in the present. Through the process which determines what have happened to us in our history, we are also actively constructing our own selves, our identities, in the present. The commemoration of those who were killed in the First and Second World Wars and later conflicts, therefore, is no longer simply a reflection of the past but it is also a part of the present reality.

It comes as no surprise, then, that when Desmond Doss argues that ‘[w]ith the world so set on tearing itself apart, it doesn’t seem like such a bad thing to me to want to put a little bit of it back together,’ Hacksaw Ridge (2016) reflects on our own times as much as on the bloodier times of the movie’s story.

Today, when sugar is deadlier than gunpowder, we have problems with receiving a tradition, as if there is no past. We find it so difficult to acknowledge that we are created, as if there is no Creator. We are, consequently, losing our collective memory – and our humanity with it. We are unhinged.

At a time when we too have to make our own way in the mess we ourselves have left, we should strive to rediscover the sacred in our lives and to recover the idea of sacrifice (of meaning, in fact), lest we are alienated from our own selves (Mark 8:36); lest we forget not only the sacrifices of the past but also life’s deepest yearnings.

Jean Claude graduated with an MSc in Anthropology in 2014 from the University of Aberdeen and is currently reading a Bachelor’s Degree in Sacred Theology at the University of Malta.

2 thoughts on “Unhinged

  • Reply Robert Gatt 10th November 2017 at 4:14 pm

    Interesting thoughts. My main reflection on these thoughts would be the following question: Provided that some (or not just some) of the elements comprising today’s way of life are disabling us from remembering chunks of an essential past that indeed forms our present, how can we receive tradition when we are becoming all the more bent to create – not just recreate – our own world without regard to our collective past? An incorrect appraisal of our present and of our past – individually and socially – would inevitably lead towards an incorrect outlook towards the future. The real problem, rather than forgetting our past, is forgetting our future by way of not reflecting, as the article rightly conveys, on our identity. We may be risking becoming a nation comprised of a conglomeration of individuals who suffer from a collective – sometimes selective – amnesia, for all the wrong reasons imaginable.

  • Reply Jean Claude Attard 10th November 2017 at 11:00 pm

    The difficulty, as I see it, is not ideological but relational. We are struggling to rediscover what connects us with both fellow humans and fellow creatures.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *